Author: Anna Pluta

Latvijas Konkurtspējas ziņojums (2010-2012)

Pētnieki: Alf Vanags, Anders Paalzow, Zane Cunska, Konstantīns Beņkovskis, Krišjānis Krustiņš un Christian Ketels

Projektu finansē LR Valsts kanceleja

The Latvia Competitiveness Report (LCR) was commissioned by the State Chancellery of the Republic of Latvia to the Stockholm School of Economics in Riga (SSE Riga) in February 2011. The commissioned report was written in Latvian and presented to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Latvia, Valdis Dombrovskis, on April 20, 2012. The project was 100% funded by the European Union through the European Social Fund. As specified by the State Chancellery the purpose of the Report is twofold: • To provide an overall assessment of the competitiveness of the Latvian economy. • To develop a methodological framework which could be employed in future assessments of Latvian competitiveness.

Too few locally produced goods on the shelves of Latvian shops: Reality or myth?

New SSE Riga/BICEPS occasional paper by Morten Hansen (SSE Riga) and Alf Vanags (BICEPS) / Presentation.

Abstract. This investigation addresses the issue of what truth there is behind the widespread belief that too few Latvian produced food products are available in Latvian shops. Using some simple concepts from economics we construct a number of empirical indicators that permit international comparisons to be made. These are indicators of revealed comparative advantage, of the extent to which home consumption of food products is covered by domestic production, indicators of the share of domestic production that is exported and imported, and indicators of productivity relative to the EU-27. We find that Latvia does not differ much in most respects from our Baltic neighbours. Both Latvia and Estonia are net importers of food products while Lithuania is marginally a net exporter. Perhaps surprisingly Latvia covers about 50% of its food products consumption from domestic production which is more than in Estonia or Lithuania. This ‘self-sufficiency’ indicator is highest in countries such as Poland and Romania, with self sufficiency ratios of around 80% and as high as 97% for some individual products. Low self sufficiency ratios are found in for example the Netherlands which covers only 15% of its food products consumption by local production. At the same time it turns out that the high self-sufficiency countries export very little of their food products whereas the Netherlands exports very nearly 90% of its food products output. We conclude that Latvia is about average in terms of the availability of local products and in fact local products are more available here than in Estonia and Lithuania. If there is a problem in Latvia it concerns low productivity levels in the food products sector. Thus in food products as a whole Latvian productivity is less than 50% of the average while in the most productive countries, such as Netherlands and Belgium it is more than three times higher. In fish products productivity is less than 30% of the EU average while in Belgium it is more than six times higher. It is here that attention should be focussed and we recommend the creation of both working groups and research to address the productivity issue.

The Case for a Latvian Version of the Obama Broadband Package

New SSE Riga/BICEPS occasional paper by Alf Vanags (BICEPS).

Executive summary. The paper investigates whether the evidence suggests that a broadband package on the lines of the Obama package in the US or the Digital Britain initiative in the UK could be an appropriate instrument in recession-hit Latvia. The idea would be to use the opportunity of the recession to create a 21st century digital infrastructure which would boost productivity and growth. Using the three pronged framework of infrastructure, readiness and use developed by Fornefeld, Delaunay and Elixmann (2008) it is shown that Latvia lags behind most of the EU in most broadband indicators. Latvia also lags in productivity with both manufacturing and services managing only 50% of the productivity level of the EU-27. A broadband development programme offers a horizontal level policy option to boost productivity, thereby avoiding the pitfall of trying to prioritize individual sectors. However, a programme is needed as well as a managing institution and most importantly funding. Perhaps the re-constituted eSecretariat now located at the Ministry of Regional Development and Local authority Affairs could serve as a managing institution. As for funding, perhaps the 4% allocated to the information society in the 2007-2013 structural funds programming period could be used or even increased. Also, Latvia is finally getting in place the legislation for public private partnership and digital development represent a potentially attractive area for such project.

Renewable Energy: Is there a Latvian Master Plan?

New SSE Riga/BICEPS occasional paper by A. Vanags, M. Kālis (BICEPS), A. Paalzow (SSE Riga), I. Indriksone, E. Balode-Buraka (RGSL).

Abstract. Global energy demand continues to grow. Crude oil production is stagnating, coal’s production cost is rising fast on the back of carbon pricing, electricity generating capacity is getting old and nuclear power has its own environmental and political issues. In addition there is the concern about climate change where the man-made CO2 emissions are the primary source of global warming. The need for more electricity and the environmental concerns drive the focus towards the renewable energy sector. Furthermore, countries are concerned about energy security, and countries urge to diversify supplies, both in terms of generation type and of geographical source. This is especially true also for Latvia that, due to its limited domestic energy resources, is one of the most dependent countries on imported energy resources with the European Union. Domestic production of primary energy in Latvian accounts for 35 per cent of total production, with the remaining 65 per cent being imported. Furthermore, oil and gas-fuelled power stations count for more than 60 per cent of the total domestic production and hence representing the largest source of primary energy in Latvia and the gas and oil supplies are fully imported.

In addition to the energy security and energy independence aspects, Latvia has, based on the European Parliament and Council Directive 2001/77/EC, also committed itself to increase its share of renewable energy in electricity consumption to 49.3 per cent. To do this, the Government of Latvia plan to gradually increase wind power share to 1.48 per cent in 2007 and 5.37 per cent in 2010. However, the capacity of wind power plants in Latvia has remained at 26.9 MW since 2003.

Taking into account the potential of wind energy and Latvia’s vulnerable position in terms of energy security and energy independence, this report analyzes the legal, economic and political aspects of further development of the wind power sector in Latvia. The findings of the show that, from a legal perspective, Latvia has properly implemented the EU law governing wind-energy production into Latvian legislation and that the current legislation contains more or less all the formal pre-requisites to encourage investments into the windgenerated energy industry. There are, however, still some question marks when it comes to the administrative practices.

The economic analysis indicates that the tariff set by the Energy Department of the Latvian Ministry of Economics in the current tender to purchase electricity from wind farms is high enough to attract investment in wind power production provided that the bureaucratic burdens of the procurement process are not perceived as too heavy. Calculations show that investment in wind-power will yield an internal rate of return of between 7.2% and 9.8% depending on what is assumed about future price developments. Of the two tariff alternatives, the fixed tariff scheme seems to be the more attractive from the investor’s perspective – hence creating the strongest incentives to invest in wind energy. The analysis also underlines the crucial role played by the state-owned energy company Latvenergo. Because of the irregular and difficult-to-predict volumes of wind-power generated electricity, the Latvenergo-owned hydroelectrical power plants and their ability to store energy have to be employed in order to balance the variation in wind-power energy generated.

Although the necessary legislation is in place, this does not necessarily imply that windgenerated power plants will be built in Latvia – there is a need for a political will and vision as well. While having a strong support among the general public, the support for and interest in renewable energy including wind energy is, with the exception of the Greens and Farmers Union, fairly weak in the current coalition government.

Stagflation in Latvia: How Long, How Far, How Deep

New SSE Riga/BICEPS occasional paper by Morten Hansen (SSE Riga) and Alf Vanags (BICEPS).

Executive summary

What a difference a year makes. Our previous report, from June 2007, focussed on overheating of the Latvian economy and rising inflation. Now, some 14 months later, the Latvian economy has entered recession as measured by two consecutive quarters of seasonally adjusted GDP decline. At the same time the latest inflation rate is down from the peak observed in May of this year.

Thus the issues to be discussed in this year’s report are somewhat different. In particular we raise five questions – questions we believe should be at the forefront of the economic-political debate in Latvia:

  1. Has inflation indeed spiked?
  2. Is disinflation (i.e. the rate of decline in inflation) likely to be fast or slow?
  3. Why has the Latvian inflation experience been so much worse than elsewhere e.g. the two other Baltic countries?
  4. How deep a recession – permitting the use of that concept – will Latvia experience?
  5. How long will it take for the economy to recover?

We offer the following responses to these questions:

  1. It is likely that inflation has indeed peaked – the slowdown of the economy and thus the unwinding of overheating in the labour market should suffice for that conclusion.
  2. The evidence from our Phillips curve analysis, i.e. the inverse link between the rate of inflation and the unemployment rate, together with the flexibility of the Latvian labour market points in the direction of a fast disinflation, while evidence from other countries emphasises the persistence of inflation. However, it needs to be borne in mind that the Phillips curve analysis also predicts that lower inflation will come at the cost of higher unemployment.
  3. A much more overheated labour market in Latvia and perhaps belated policy response are to blame for the worse performance in Latvia.
  4.  and 5. Evidence from international experience suggests that the cumulative loss from a recession might be the equivalent of two years of double digit GDP growth relative to trend. Instead of growing 10-11% as was the norm until 2008 negative growth – recession – is on the cards. This loss of potential GDP is a setback for the prospects of Latvian convergence. The Latvian economy may be expected to resume normal growth in 2010.

Do Political Connections Matter? Firm-Level Evidence from Latvia

New SSE Riga/BICEPS research paper by V. Dombrovsky (BICEPS, SSE Riga).

Abstract. This paper examines the effect of political connections on firm performance. It draws on the universe of all registered firms in Latvia to construct a unique dataset of firms connected to politicians in 1996 to 2005. This paper shows that the effects of connections to politicians vary depending on the type of connection. Using fixed effects framework, it finds that firms that acquire politicians as their shareholders or board members experience a drop in the sales by 40%, followed by an increase in sales by 75% in the following year. This finding suggests that politicians join the firms in distress and help with political favors. However, this paper finds no effect from changes in the strength of political connections caused by changes in the ruling coalition. It also finds that connection with ex-politicians has no effect on firm performance.

Campaign Contributions and Firm Performance: The “Latvian Way”

New SSE Riga/BICEPS research paper by V. Dombrovsky (BICEPS, SSE Riga).

Abstract. This paper examines the effect of campaign contributions on firm performance in Latvia, using a quasi-experiment provided by the 2002 elections. An unanticipated result of the election was that the ‘Latvian Way’, one of the most influential parties, failed to be reelected and was replaced by the ‘First Party’. It constructs a unique dataset of firm-level campaign contributions by identifying all firms that donated directly or through its board member or shareholder. This paper finds that firms that provided contributions to the ‘Latvian Way’ experienced substantial decrease in sales in the after-election year, compared to firms that did not contribute. In contrast, firms that contributed to the ‘First Party’ experienced significant increase in sales. These findings suggest campaign contributions help firms benefit from firm-specific political favors.